The YouTube clip climbing US search lists this week under the title “Dai Dai Iko – Shakira & Cristiano Ronaldo | Portugal 2026” was not posted by Shakira, her label or the Portuguese star. It went up at 7 a.m. Pacific on Sunday, October 18, on a channel called Davuiside, which describes its owner as a music producer and DJ and lists Germany as its country. In roughly its first day it drew close to 40,000 views.
The 2-minute-32-second upload is a fan production built on “Dai Dai”, the official song of the 2026 World Cup. Its own tags call it a cover and a “Dai Dai Remix,” and its hashtags place it in afro house, slap house and phonk, the bass-heavy styles that soundtrack car and highlight edits on TikTok. Nothing in the description explains what “Iko” refers to.
The song behind the edit
The original is a duet between Colombian singer Shakira and Nigerian star Burna Boy, released on May 15, 2026, through Ace Entertainment and Sony Music Latin. Shakira first teased it on May 7 with a 67-second clip shot on the field of Rio de Janeiro’s Maracanã Stadium, balancing the tournament ball, the Trionda. The title is Italian slang for “come on,” the kind of shout a coach aims at a tired midfielder.
Ronaldo’s name is in the lyric, which is why editors keep pairing the two. One verse runs through a roll call of greats, “Pelé, Maradona, Maldini, Romário, Cristiano, Ronaldo,” before moving on to Messi, Mbappé and Salah and a list of competing nations. He does not, however, appear in the official music video. That clip, directed by Hannah Lux Davis in Miami and released on May 23, opens with cameos from Lionel Messi, Kylian Mbappé and Erling Haaland.
Shakira said she would give all of her earnings from the track to FIFA’s education fund, which was aiming to raise $100 million during the tournament. Burna Boy, for his part, pitched the record as proof that football and music bring people together regardless of where they come from.
A record run for a World Cup song
“Dai Dai” is Shakira’s fourth official World Cup song and her biggest in the US. It entered the Hot 100 at No. 75 and climbed to No. 17 on the chart dated August 1, after the July 19 final at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, where she and Burna Boy performed it at the first World Cup final halftime show. For comparison, “Waka Waka (This Time for Africa)” topped out at No. 21 in 2010, so the new song beat her own previous best by four places. The official video passed 1 billion YouTube views on September 6.
That scale explains the flood of unofficial versions. A YouTube search for the trending title also turns up Ronaldo highlight reels set to the song, some with millions of views, alongside lyric channels and tribute montages.
How to tell a fan edit from the real release
- Check the uploader, not the title. The official video sits on the shakiraVEVO channel, and the official audio on Shakira’s own channel. The trending clip’s embed data names Davuiside as its author.
- Read the badge carefully. Davuiside carries YouTube’s “Official Artist Channel” badge, but that marks the producer’s own artist page, not a link to Shakira.
- Look for credits. The description links only to the producer’s Spotify, Instagram and SoundCloud pages and does not credit Shakira, Burna Boy or the label.
Our take on the clip
As a piece of fan culture, the upload is ordinary and fairly honest about what it is: the description says cover and remix, and the channel has been posting since 2017, with 219 videos and more than 105 million total views. The trouble sits in the headline. Putting two of the most searched names in the world side by side with an ampersand reads, at a glance, like a collaboration, and nothing on screen in a search result says otherwise. The official release is a Shakira and Burna Boy duet, and Ronaldo’s part in it is two words in a verse.
For anyone who wants the real thing, a Spanish version and a Portuguese-language version both followed on August 7, and the 3-minute-43-second original is still the one with the halftime-show pedigree.
Further reading
Image: J.ébey, CC0 via Wikimedia Commons
This article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed by our Editorial Desk. How we work.
